Rahim Tabet | Oktober 24, 2014 |
Entertainment
|
The Fact
Human history would be determined by dark societies behind the scenes. So says Dan Brown in his famous religious thriller "The Da Vinci Code", which is based on the fantasies of the French anti-Semite Plantard. Like all previous authors who popularized Plantard's myths, Brown also feeds the anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic conspiracy thinking.
The thriller is really nothing more than a simple boys. The main character Professor Robert Langdon is suspected of the murder of the curator Jacques Saunière of the Louvre in Paris. That left a message. On the run from the police and opposed by the Catholic organization Opus Dei Langdon with cryptologist Sophie Neveu a quest for the hidden meaning of Saunières message. They discover a mysterious society, the Priory of Sion, which preserves a treasure for some 900 years, the "holy grail", the cup from which Jesus drank at the Last Supper and that his blood would be collected during the crucifixion . Langdon and Neveu not find the grail. After many developments eventually
Brown's book is a hype. More than 10 million worldwide have been sold in the Netherlands, about 200 thousand. It will shortly be filmed. Readers discuss it on the Internet and in pubs. Masses of tourists have already visited the places in Paris that describes Brown. The tourist industry makes a lot of money with special "Da Vinci code" trips.
Descendants of Jesus
Conspiracy stories are always a big bad and invisible power that suppresses the good. The genre is characterized by the blending of all kinds of half-truths, outright lies, by bringing together various historical and fictional events, absurd manner and by the right wing and reactionary interpretations of those events. Conspiracy in line with real feelings of powerlessness, but takes the attention of the concrete everyday oppressive relations away and put in its place fabricated mythical powers. Instead of the reader "aware" and to break free, as conspiracy authors often claim, correctly powerlessness palmed this type of stories, the ability to understand social and political situations dulled and so the possibility of a serious leftist struggle for liberation limited.
The storyline and characters in "The Da Vinci Code" are fictitious, Brown said. But the core of the story would be based on "facts" that would have been for centuries by the Catholic Church, he asserts emphatically in the book and in interviews. The Priory of Sion (Priory of Sion) would actually exist. That "secret society" was founded in 1099 and would have always had a lot of influence in powerful circles and guard a big "secret" about the origins of Christianity.
That suppressed "secret" According to Brown that Jesus would have been with Mary Magdalene, according to the official Vatican doctrine was a prostitute married. Jesus and Mary Magdalene would have had children. The suppression of the "truth" about Mary Magdalene would symbolize the oppression of women in the catholic church. The Priory would thus favors a better Christianity, whereby the role of mother is wrongly presented as liberating. Mary Magdalene would be after the crucifixion of Jesus with the children to southern France have fled and lived on in a Jewish community. Jesus' children would have again had children, and their offspring would have spread more and more. Would be a descendant of Jesus in the fifth century married someone of "French royal blood." That would be the beginning of the dynasty of the Merovingian kings. From the concept of "royal blood" ("sang real") would be the word "grail" are derived. "The Grail" would not only as an object, but also as a symbol of the descendants of Jesus and pedigree to be understood. The French Duke Godfrey of Bouillon would be one of the descendants of Jesus have been. That Duke began at the end of the eleventh century the first crusade conquered Jerusalem and became king. So Brown suggests, Jesus' descendants would have still recovered which was on the right. Jesus would have been, after all, "King of the Jews". The crusades were perfectly legitimate, in this perspective, instead of robbery against "infidels" murder and plunder.
Because the Catholic Church considers itself the only true heir of Jesus, would these ideas in the Vatican did not fall on fertile ground. The views on an emancipated Christianity would have the power in the male dominated Vatican called stand. Therefore one would have those ideas keenly contested. From Bouillon would the Priory of Sion have after his death anyway to keep the "secret" was established. Their members should protect "the secret" from generation to generation. Would have later heard that there were "the secret" would prove. Documents in Jerusalem, under the ruins of the Temple of Herod which is built on the temple of Solomon, Priory members The Priory would have founded a military branch, the Knights Templar, who accepted under the guise of protecting pilgrims to Jerusalem after these documents. They would indeed have documents and a vast treasure found so they would have become. More powerful in the thirteenth century, To the dismay of the Vatican, which would have precisely why the early fourteenth century persecuted them as heretics and killed mercilessly. The documents, however, would have remained in possession of the Priory. Would the Vatican and the Priory have subsequently entered into a tacit agreement: if the Vatican did not attack the Priory, which would keep hidden than the Sangreal documents. The story goes that include Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo and Claude Debussy leaders - "masters" - the Priory would have been. That supposedly still going to be some day show "The Secret". These are "the facts" in Brown's book.
Fantast and charlatan
Orthodox Christians react furiously to the idea that Jesus was married and had sex, and scientists criticize Brown because his "facts" are not correct or would be highly unlikely. But the concepts of God and divine son Jesus fiction anyway, and all religions are first and foremost oppressive ideologies. Never again is to examine what then exactly happened. It is also not to determine that. Critics of Brown should not want to go into all sorts of alleged "facts" because that is what the conspiracy thinkers correct. The conspiracy thinking that should be fought, that's the point. The problem is the structure of thought and reactionary analysis of society that hides behind it. Brown should be criticized for his contribution to the emerging worldwide believe in conspiracy theories.
Browns "facts" about the existence of the Priory, its political and economic influence and the power struggle with the Vatican appear to originate from a single anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic fantasist and charlatan, Frenchman Pierre Plantard. Are That was possessed by the idea of conspiracies. Before World War II Plantard founded the French Union, a movement against Jews and Masons. In 1940 he warned Marshal Petain, leader of the Nazi collaborationist Vichy France, in a letter to a conspiracy of Jews and Freemasons. In 1942 and 1943 he published the anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic magazine "Vaincre". In it he criticized some Vichy government members sometimes aided Jews. "I want to let Hitler's Germany know that every obstacle to our own plans will cause him damage, because it is the resistance set up by Freemasonry that undermines the German power."
In 1956 Plantard founded a rather clumsy group of friends that he called the Priory of Sion, a mountain in the same area. All roll legends about a powerful and ancient Priory society can ultimately be traced back to Plantard. He called himself "master" of his Priory, and a family tree which supposedly proved that he was descended from the Merovingian kings. In reality Plantard's earliest known ancestor a sixteenth century farmer cultivating walnuts. According to André Bonhomme, a former friend of Plantard and Chairman of the Priory club, Plantard had always been bothered by a big imagination. (4) Browns Priory of Sion is pure nonsense.
Fabrications
Plantard's fantasies are so often reproduced by scores of writers, researchers and documentary makers that they should be in the eyes of many people be true. For example, well-known "conspiracy experts" as Jim Marrs and David Icke also devote much attention to. Brown's "Da Vinci Code" However, they mainly based on the published in 1982 book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" of "researchers" Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. "An indispensable book for all fans of The Da Vinci Code", is on the cover of a reprint in 2004. In exchange for a coupon included in the book the buyer may receive a discount on "The Da Vinci Code". Recently "The bloodline of the Grail" of the Scottish "genealogist" Laurence Gardner, a sequel to "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" and again a must for fans of "The Da Vinci Code". "Gardner starts where others stop," says the back cover. To be tired of.
"Holy blood" purports to provide evidence for the existence of the Priory since 1099, but this depends reality of fantasy. For conspiracy experts "and anti-Semites like Peter Edel, who are attracted to the book, is not a problem. The book could be, because it can be what really happened, not best determined based on truth Edel for instance. According to the three authors "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" ultimately "one of the most convincing evidence of the existence of the Priory of Sion." In reality, it is a notorious anti-Semitic fantasy about a Jewish conspiracy, which also inspired the Nazis. However, the three claim that "The Protocols" not a fantasy but a forgery, based on an earlier authentic text. That "had nothing to do with Judaism or an 'international Jewish conspiracy", but came from the ranks of freemasons or a secret society that the word "Zion" in its name, "write the three visionaries. The original text "may well have includes a program to seize power, to infiltrate the Freemasons and get social, political and economic institutions under control. Even without a Jewish kind of conspiracy thinking remains dangerous nonsense.
Priest-King
According to the three authors Priory has "influence on important international events and also plays a role in the internal politics of some European countries." The Priory was involved "at important events in Western history." The purpose of the Priory would be "bringing again the power of the Merovingian dynasty and its descendants, not only in France but also in other countries." That would be "justified" because the descendants of those kings would also have currents and the rightful heirs to the throne. "Royal blood" of Jesus in the veins "The various families of the Merovingian kings were in the past closely involved in politics and they were seeking political power. It also seems the Priory of Sion and some of its grandmasters," the authors write. "There is no reason to believe that politics today is less important for Sion and sex. Everything indicates that Sion thinks of a unity between church and state, a combination of the spiritual and secular, the sacred and the earthly from politics and religion. Sion ensures in many documents that the new king, according to the Merovingian tradition, will "reign but not govern '." It would be a "priest-king" should be "a theocratic United States of Europe", in "a kind of twentieth century feudal system." The Priory would take "real control" in itself.
The three take Plantard's Priory fantasies seriously. "We know that the Priory of Sion is not an organization of 'idiots'. We know they have lots of money and that people in influential positions in politics, the economy, the media and the arts are members or sympathy for them. We have know that the number of members has quadrupled since 1956, as if on preparing somewhere. Plantard told us that his order and he works as a fairly precise timetable. We also know that Zion since 1956 leaked certain information. They did that and little by little, just enough to create curiosity and provide interesting prospects. the time seems ripe for the Prieuré to show his cards. the political systems and ideologies, which seemed so much in the beginning of this century to promise are all more or less gone bankrupt. Communism, fascism, capitalism and Western democracy have broken all their promises, their supporters disappointed and the dreams they called, did not deliver. According to the authors therefore "a renewed need for something sacred," to "a true leader". "Not a Führer, but a wise, lovable figure, and priest-king which humankind can trust." Fortunately the Priory was just one of the omnipotence fantasies Plantard, who died in 2000. Unfortunately, anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic myths still continuing.
The thriller is really nothing more than a simple boys. The main character Professor Robert Langdon is suspected of the murder of the curator Jacques Saunière of the Louvre in Paris. That left a message. On the run from the police and opposed by the Catholic organization Opus Dei Langdon with cryptologist Sophie Neveu a quest for the hidden meaning of Saunières message. They discover a mysterious society, the Priory of Sion, which preserves a treasure for some 900 years, the "holy grail", the cup from which Jesus drank at the Last Supper and that his blood would be collected during the crucifixion . Langdon and Neveu not find the grail. After many developments eventually
Brown's book is a hype. More than 10 million worldwide have been sold in the Netherlands, about 200 thousand. It will shortly be filmed. Readers discuss it on the Internet and in pubs. Masses of tourists have already visited the places in Paris that describes Brown. The tourist industry makes a lot of money with special "Da Vinci code" trips.
Descendants of Jesus
Conspiracy stories are always a big bad and invisible power that suppresses the good. The genre is characterized by the blending of all kinds of half-truths, outright lies, by bringing together various historical and fictional events, absurd manner and by the right wing and reactionary interpretations of those events. Conspiracy in line with real feelings of powerlessness, but takes the attention of the concrete everyday oppressive relations away and put in its place fabricated mythical powers. Instead of the reader "aware" and to break free, as conspiracy authors often claim, correctly powerlessness palmed this type of stories, the ability to understand social and political situations dulled and so the possibility of a serious leftist struggle for liberation limited.
The storyline and characters in "The Da Vinci Code" are fictitious, Brown said. But the core of the story would be based on "facts" that would have been for centuries by the Catholic Church, he asserts emphatically in the book and in interviews. The Priory of Sion (Priory of Sion) would actually exist. That "secret society" was founded in 1099 and would have always had a lot of influence in powerful circles and guard a big "secret" about the origins of Christianity.
 |
| lifeand100books.com |
That suppressed "secret" According to Brown that Jesus would have been with Mary Magdalene, according to the official Vatican doctrine was a prostitute married. Jesus and Mary Magdalene would have had children. The suppression of the "truth" about Mary Magdalene would symbolize the oppression of women in the catholic church. The Priory would thus favors a better Christianity, whereby the role of mother is wrongly presented as liberating. Mary Magdalene would be after the crucifixion of Jesus with the children to southern France have fled and lived on in a Jewish community. Jesus' children would have again had children, and their offspring would have spread more and more. Would be a descendant of Jesus in the fifth century married someone of "French royal blood." That would be the beginning of the dynasty of the Merovingian kings. From the concept of "royal blood" ("sang real") would be the word "grail" are derived. "The Grail" would not only as an object, but also as a symbol of the descendants of Jesus and pedigree to be understood. The French Duke Godfrey of Bouillon would be one of the descendants of Jesus have been. That Duke began at the end of the eleventh century the first crusade conquered Jerusalem and became king. So Brown suggests, Jesus' descendants would have still recovered which was on the right. Jesus would have been, after all, "King of the Jews". The crusades were perfectly legitimate, in this perspective, instead of robbery against "infidels" murder and plunder.
Because the Catholic Church considers itself the only true heir of Jesus, would these ideas in the Vatican did not fall on fertile ground. The views on an emancipated Christianity would have the power in the male dominated Vatican called stand. Therefore one would have those ideas keenly contested. From Bouillon would the Priory of Sion have after his death anyway to keep the "secret" was established. Their members should protect "the secret" from generation to generation. Would have later heard that there were "the secret" would prove. Documents in Jerusalem, under the ruins of the Temple of Herod which is built on the temple of Solomon, Priory members The Priory would have founded a military branch, the Knights Templar, who accepted under the guise of protecting pilgrims to Jerusalem after these documents. They would indeed have documents and a vast treasure found so they would have become. More powerful in the thirteenth century, To the dismay of the Vatican, which would have precisely why the early fourteenth century persecuted them as heretics and killed mercilessly. The documents, however, would have remained in possession of the Priory. Would the Vatican and the Priory have subsequently entered into a tacit agreement: if the Vatican did not attack the Priory, which would keep hidden than the Sangreal documents. The story goes that include Leonardo Da Vinci, Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo and Claude Debussy leaders - "masters" - the Priory would have been. That supposedly still going to be some day show "The Secret". These are "the facts" in Brown's book.
Fantast and charlatan
Orthodox Christians react furiously to the idea that Jesus was married and had sex, and scientists criticize Brown because his "facts" are not correct or would be highly unlikely. But the concepts of God and divine son Jesus fiction anyway, and all religions are first and foremost oppressive ideologies. Never again is to examine what then exactly happened. It is also not to determine that. Critics of Brown should not want to go into all sorts of alleged "facts" because that is what the conspiracy thinkers correct. The conspiracy thinking that should be fought, that's the point. The problem is the structure of thought and reactionary analysis of society that hides behind it. Brown should be criticized for his contribution to the emerging worldwide believe in conspiracy theories.
Browns "facts" about the existence of the Priory, its political and economic influence and the power struggle with the Vatican appear to originate from a single anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic fantasist and charlatan, Frenchman Pierre Plantard. Are That was possessed by the idea of conspiracies. Before World War II Plantard founded the French Union, a movement against Jews and Masons. In 1940 he warned Marshal Petain, leader of the Nazi collaborationist Vichy France, in a letter to a conspiracy of Jews and Freemasons. In 1942 and 1943 he published the anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic magazine "Vaincre". In it he criticized some Vichy government members sometimes aided Jews. "I want to let Hitler's Germany know that every obstacle to our own plans will cause him damage, because it is the resistance set up by Freemasonry that undermines the German power."
In 1956 Plantard founded a rather clumsy group of friends that he called the Priory of Sion, a mountain in the same area. All roll legends about a powerful and ancient Priory society can ultimately be traced back to Plantard. He called himself "master" of his Priory, and a family tree which supposedly proved that he was descended from the Merovingian kings. In reality Plantard's earliest known ancestor a sixteenth century farmer cultivating walnuts. According to André Bonhomme, a former friend of Plantard and Chairman of the Priory club, Plantard had always been bothered by a big imagination. (4) Browns Priory of Sion is pure nonsense.
Fabrications
Plantard's fantasies are so often reproduced by scores of writers, researchers and documentary makers that they should be in the eyes of many people be true. For example, well-known "conspiracy experts" as Jim Marrs and David Icke also devote much attention to. Brown's "Da Vinci Code" However, they mainly based on the published in 1982 book "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" of "researchers" Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. "An indispensable book for all fans of The Da Vinci Code", is on the cover of a reprint in 2004. In exchange for a coupon included in the book the buyer may receive a discount on "The Da Vinci Code". Recently "The bloodline of the Grail" of the Scottish "genealogist" Laurence Gardner, a sequel to "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail" and again a must for fans of "The Da Vinci Code". "Gardner starts where others stop," says the back cover. To be tired of.
"Holy blood" purports to provide evidence for the existence of the Priory since 1099, but this depends reality of fantasy. For conspiracy experts "and anti-Semites like Peter Edel, who are attracted to the book, is not a problem. The book could be, because it can be what really happened, not best determined based on truth Edel for instance. According to the three authors "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" ultimately "one of the most convincing evidence of the existence of the Priory of Sion." In reality, it is a notorious anti-Semitic fantasy about a Jewish conspiracy, which also inspired the Nazis. However, the three claim that "The Protocols" not a fantasy but a forgery, based on an earlier authentic text. That "had nothing to do with Judaism or an 'international Jewish conspiracy", but came from the ranks of freemasons or a secret society that the word "Zion" in its name, "write the three visionaries. The original text "may well have includes a program to seize power, to infiltrate the Freemasons and get social, political and economic institutions under control. Even without a Jewish kind of conspiracy thinking remains dangerous nonsense.
Priest-King
According to the three authors Priory has "influence on important international events and also plays a role in the internal politics of some European countries." The Priory was involved "at important events in Western history." The purpose of the Priory would be "bringing again the power of the Merovingian dynasty and its descendants, not only in France but also in other countries." That would be "justified" because the descendants of those kings would also have currents and the rightful heirs to the throne. "Royal blood" of Jesus in the veins "The various families of the Merovingian kings were in the past closely involved in politics and they were seeking political power. It also seems the Priory of Sion and some of its grandmasters," the authors write. "There is no reason to believe that politics today is less important for Sion and sex. Everything indicates that Sion thinks of a unity between church and state, a combination of the spiritual and secular, the sacred and the earthly from politics and religion. Sion ensures in many documents that the new king, according to the Merovingian tradition, will "reign but not govern '." It would be a "priest-king" should be "a theocratic United States of Europe", in "a kind of twentieth century feudal system." The Priory would take "real control" in itself.
The three take Plantard's Priory fantasies seriously. "We know that the Priory of Sion is not an organization of 'idiots'. We know they have lots of money and that people in influential positions in politics, the economy, the media and the arts are members or sympathy for them. We have know that the number of members has quadrupled since 1956, as if on preparing somewhere. Plantard told us that his order and he works as a fairly precise timetable. We also know that Zion since 1956 leaked certain information. They did that and little by little, just enough to create curiosity and provide interesting prospects. the time seems ripe for the Prieuré to show his cards. the political systems and ideologies, which seemed so much in the beginning of this century to promise are all more or less gone bankrupt. Communism, fascism, capitalism and Western democracy have broken all their promises, their supporters disappointed and the dreams they called, did not deliver. According to the authors therefore "a renewed need for something sacred," to "a true leader". "Not a Führer, but a wise, lovable figure, and priest-king which humankind can trust." Fortunately the Priory was just one of the omnipotence fantasies Plantard, who died in 2000. Unfortunately, anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic myths still continuing.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar